COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2

Do you want to be a guinea pig for a new type of vaccine that has been insufficiently tested when it might only end up giving you the same side-effects as the virus itself?

It really makes no sense to rush out a vaccine for a virus that, according to the US Centre for Disease Control, has a 95% survival rate particularly when, as the evidence shows, 80% of people only experience mild to moderate symptoms. The 5% who died were very old and or had co-morbidities but this statistic is only the same amount that would usually die from seasonal flu or pneumonia, so why the hysteria? Are the media instilling us with fear so that the pharmaceutical industry can cash-in on their latest vaccine? 

Chasing the promise of increased revenues that capitalise on Covid fear, the pharmaceutical companies have been falling over themselves in the race to be the first to come up with a vaccine. The UK vaccine is a joint venture between BioNTech and Pfizer but the trials have shown that it only ends up giving healthy people the same side-effects as the virus itself.

Peter Doshi, Associate Editor of the BMJ writes: In one Pfizer trial, for example, more than half of the vaccinated participants experienced headache, muscle pain and chills—but the early phase trials were small, with large margins of error around the data. Few details from the large phase 3 studies have been released thus far. Pfizer’s statement reported 3.8% experienced grade 3 fatigue and 2% grade 3 headache. Grade 3 adverse events are considered severe, defined as preventing daily activity. Mild and moderate severity reactions are bound to be far more common.

Also, it has been widely reported that the people chosen for the vaccine trials were extremely healthy individuals. It is therefore not known what the effects of the vaccine will be on unhealthy people, those who are already ill with a disease, or the elderly. If the virus itself is killing older people with co-morbidities then how will injecting them with it be helpful?

The UK Government says that the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is ‘authorised for temporary supply by the UK Department of Health and Social Care for people aged 16 and over.‘ But what they don’t say is that the MHRA have approved this vaccine for use in the UK without any peer reviewed publications. A Freedom of Information (FOI) request for the submitted data was refused under clauses 41 and 43 as being ‘not in the public interest’ and ‘commercially sensitive’.

Doshi went on to point out that the Pfizer trials have lasted only a few months so nobody knows what the side effects or efficacy will be over the next few years. The trial design and results have not been subject to external peer review so public roll out of this vaccine will effectively be a phase four trial without the public consent.

Dr Tony Fauci, Director of the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), described it as “really rushed”.

“But they just took the data from the Pfizer company. And instead of scrutinizing it really, really carefully, they said, OK, let’s approve it. That’s it. And they went with it.”
– Dr Anthony Fauci, NAID, 

quoted by Politico

On 1st December ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research Dr Michael Yeadon filed an application with the EMA for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42).

The COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is given as an injection of 0.3 mL in the upper arm. It is required to have two injections given 21 days apart.‘ BUT they admit that it ‘may not fully protect all those who receive it‘. So you are submitting yourself to a vaccine that has been rushed through putting yourself at risk of side effects and potential disruption to your DNA for  something that might not even work.

Given the warning that ‘there is currently limited data available on the use of this vaccine in pregnant women‘ combined with the capacity of the vaccine to alter DNA structure, pregnant women would be wise to avoid it.

Point 4.6 of the government document states “It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility”. The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals, including humans. Therefore there is a real danger that mRNA vaccines will not only prevent developing of Covid-19 symptoms but will also effectively sterilise vaccinated women by training the female body to attack syncytin-1.

Syncytin-1 is also present in sperm, so it’s not only women that will be sterilised by this vaccine.


The ingredients below have been included on a UK government information sheet but they don’t include all of the ingredients, which to me is very suspicious. The PDF can be viewed here:

For a start vaccines for viral diseases always contain human or animal DNA because they need to be grown on living cells.  Cell lines are often used where cells from an animal or human are grown for many generations in a laboratory.  Virus strains can be bred in cells taken from sheep guts, monkey brains, chick embryonic fluid, and human foetuses – human cell lines are listed as diploid cells. Cell lines are often contaminated. This vaccine is reported by ANH International to have been grown on chimp tissue, which means it will contain remnants of chimp DNA and possible undisclosed contaminants. There are no studies on the long-term health effects of having animal DNA injected into the human body, so nobody knows how this will affect humanity.

Secondly vaccines always contain either aluminium or mercury as an adjuvant to provoke an immune response. Both are known neurotoxins yet they are being injected straight into the blood stream so they can enter the brain of the recipient. The safety of this practice is questionable.

This new vaccine contains other toxins but we are not given the amounts so it isn’t possible for individuals to make an informed choice about safety.

The nanoparticle composition has been released by the MHRA but it does not include concentrations of ingredients making it impossible to assess toxicology. The ingredients will include 30 micrograms mRNA in each dose, along with:
– ALC-0315 = (4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate),
– ALC-0159 = 2[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide,
– 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine,
– cholesterol, 
– potassium chloride,
– potassium dihydrogen phosphate,
– sodium chloride,
– disodium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate,
– sucrose. 

The ALC-0315 is a hexane containing compound and these are known to be potentially neurotoxic. ALC-0159 contains polyethylene glycol (PEG) that is associated with hypersensitivity and allergenic reactions. The toxicological profile of the mRNA delivery system cannot be determined because neither have the concentrations been declared, nor has the nanoparticle delivery system, surface charges and other physicochemical characteristics been declared. These may dramatically increase the toxicological profile.

If in doubt ask for the packaging insert from the nurse giving the vaccinations at your doctors surgery.  Some are available online. At the time of writing there was no official packaging insert published online for the Pfizer Covid vaccine.


‘The active substance is BNT162b2 RNA. After dilution, the vial contains 5 doses, of 0.3 mL with 30 micrograms mRNA each.’

BNT162b2 is nucleoside-modified mRNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles which Reuters reported is a ‘chemical messenger to instruct cells to make proteins that mimic the outer surface of the new coronavirus, thereby creating immunity‘. This sounds fairly bland until you research it further and discover that mRNA is messenger RNA, which, according to the Encyclopaedia Britannica, changes the structure of DNA.

So BNT162b2 is an active ingredient that changes the structure of DNA. The diagram below, from the Encyclopaedia Britannica, shows how messenger RNA unzips strands of DNA inside cells and allows free RNA to link with the separated strands, thus changing the structure.

Do you want a substance circulating around your body which has the ability to alter your DNA? This will make you genetically modified. What will the long term effects be on humanity?

There is currently no other RNA vaccine under FDA approval so there is no safety data on this type of technology. Previous animal studies on RNA vaccines initially showed good immune responses but when the virus was introduced they ended up having a ‘cytokine storm’ which provoked a worse response to the virus. This means that the RNA component of the vaccine can cause worse reactions to the virus that if you contracted the virus itself! Animal studies have not be done on any Covid vaccines so humans are effectively the unknowing guinea pigs.


A nanoparticle is a tiny robot that can collect biometric data and then act as antenna that can communicate with a cloud and save the data. The question is who is going to harvest this data and how are they going to use it?

Once nanoparticles are injected into the blood they cannot be removed. This process cannot be detoxed as with other vaccine ingredients such as aluminium and mercury which could be flushed out of the body with various detox regimes.

ALC-0315 = (4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate)

When searching on ALC-0315 on the internet nothing came up to explain exactly what it is other than it being a ‘lipid’. I find it quite disturbing that we are expected to allow a substance that we can’t research to be injected directly into our blood stream. Here is a breakdown of the individual components of ALC-0315:

4-hydroxybutyl acrylate comes up as being a corrosive irritant used in industrial paint and plastics.

According to the classification provided by companies to ECHA in REACH registrations this substance is harmful if swallowed, causes serious eye damage, causes skin irritation and may cause an allergic skin reaction. Additionally this substance is harmful in contact with skin, is harmful if inhaled and may cause respiratory irritation.

hexane-6,1-diyl is a polyfluorene derivative which can be used in intracellular imaging of cells in the body.!divAbstract

ALC-0159 = 2[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide

ALC-0159 is a lipid used to make nanoparticles.

Polyethylene glycol or PEG has never been used in a vaccine before but it is used in a multitude of personal care products and hypersensitive or allergic reactions to it are becoming an increasing concern with 70% of people developing antibodies against this substance. This means that many people could develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.

Wenande E, Garvey LH (July 2016). “Immediate-type hypersensitivity to polyethylene glycols: a review”Clinical and Experimental Allergy46(7): 907–22. doi:10.1111/cea.12760PMID 27196817.^ 

Stone CA, Liu Y, Relling MV, Krantz MS, Pratt AL, Abreo A, et al. (May 2019). “Immediate Hypersensitivity to Polyethylene Glycols and Polysorbates: More Common Than We Have Recognized”The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. In Practice7 (5): 1533–1540.e8. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2018.12.003PMC 6706272PMID 30557713.


This is a hazardous substance that is classed as ‘harmful if swallowed’. The Research Certificate of Analysis makes the following statements:

Acute toxicity, Oral (Category 4), H302
Acute toxicity, Inhalation (Category 3), H331
Skin irritation (Category 2), H315

Eye irritation (Category 2A), H319
Carcinogenicity (Category 2), H351
Reproductive toxicity (Category 2), H361
Specific target organ toxicity – single exposure (Category 3), Central nervous system, H336 Specific target organ toxicity – repeated exposure (Category 1), Liver, Kidney, H372

Acute aquatic toxicity (Category 3), H402

The PDF can be accessed at

Potassium Chloride

Potassium Chloride can be used in tablet form to boost potassium levels in someone who has been tested for low potassium. It should not be given to people who have high potassium levels. Potassium Chloride tablets are processed in the gut and can cause side effects so caution should be used when they are taken orally. The side effects for oral ingestion are listed here:

Potassium Chloride can be injected to avoid gastric issues but there are still side effects to consider and also restrictions on dosage. Because the amounts of the ingredients in the vaccine are not stated, we don’t know if the levels of Potassium Chloride are within the recommended limits.

Rather confusingly a recent data sheet states that it is ‘for laboratory and manufacturing use only. Laboratory chemicals: Not for food, drug or household use‘.

The chloride ion is formed when chlorine is bonded to another chemical to form a compound. Chlorine is a toxic halide that mimics iodine and blocks iodine uptake to the thyroid and female breast tissue causing underactive thyroid and breast cancer. See the work of Dr David Brownstein for further information on the dangers of halides to the body. Also read my posts on this blog about underactive thyroid and the need for iodine.

Potassium Dihydrogen Phosphate

The Merck safety data sheet for potassium dihydrogen phosphate lists ‘irritant effects, gastric pain, diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, and discomfort’.,MDA_CHEM-137039

Sodium Chloride

Sodium chloride is a metal halide which can be injected into the body with some side effects as listed here:

Disodium Hydrogen Phosphate Dihydrate

Is listed as a corrosive irritant.

BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH
Kupferbergterrasse 17-19
55116 Mainz

Here are some good videos about the Pfizer vaccine:

13 thoughts on “COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2

  1. Very enlightening – I would just question the definition of nanoparticles as robots, as I think these are being confused with ‘nanobots’. Nanoparticles are just very small particles.


    1. No, nano particles are not ‘just very small particles’. They perform functions in the body and are therefore like ‘tiny robots’. They are put in the body specifically to collect biological data about the human host. The robot can then connect with 5g and transmit this data. This is the start of turning humans into robots – I have written about this already on my site if you scroll down through the posts during the spring and summer.


  2. This is a very well researched, well thought out article. There were a couple of typos. Nothing that diminishes content, but I have friends that nitpick everything I share with them if it doesn’t align with their brainwashing. I’ll have to check out your article on nanoparticles.


    1. Thank you for alerting me to the typos Jessica. Sometimes I read things so many times I can’t see the wood for the trees. I’ve gone back though it and hopefully made the necessary changes that will enable you to share it with confidence. 🙂


  3. I am trying to research the ingredients of this vaccine – which is extremely difficult from Pfizer – I am going to request information from them too. My question – re animal and human DNA/RNA is it contained in the vaccine?
    Are there any other animal human products? So difficult to accurately research from government sources as a registered nurse I am bound by my duty of care to ensure I perform evidence based practice and am able to provide enough information to the recipient for informed decision making and to gain consent. 🤔


    1. Hi Angela all that I knew to the publication date is in the article. I haven’t done further research on it since publication so I can’t help you further. If I get more info I will update the post. Best wishes


  4. Thank you. One more typo to fix. A very helpful and sobering review on this vaccine!

    “Do you want a substance circulating around your body which can has the ability to alter your DNA? This will make you genetically modified.”

    Should be: “Do you want a substance circulating around your body which (can – delete) has the ability to alter your DNA? This will make you genetically modified.”


  5. hello if you want more information pls look
    up Dr Sherri Tenpenny
    who talks about the vaccines in details and be doing n research about vaccines for 20 yrs and there are video too.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s